The Role of Autonomous Shipping in Revolutionizing Global Maritime Transport
Keywords:
Autonomous shipping, Maritime transport, Regulatory challenges, Sustainability, Technological advancementsAbstract
The advent of autonomous shipping is poised to revolutionize global maritime transport by enhancing efficiency, safety, and sustainability. This study investigates the current state and future prospects of autonomous vessels in the shipping industry. The primary objective is to analyze the technological advancements, regulatory challenges, and economic implications associated with the integration of autonomous ships. A mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative research, was employed, including a review of relevant literature and case studies of existing autonomous shipping projects. The findings reveal that while autonomous ships offer significant benefits such as reduced operational costs, lower emissions, and fewer human errors, there are challenges related to legal frameworks, cybersecurity, and public acceptance. The implications of this research highlight the need for international cooperation and the development of new regulations to support the widespread adoption of autonomous shipping technologies. This transformation could lead to a more efficient, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective global maritime transport system.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chen, X., & Lin, L. (2020). Autonomous ships: Technological advancements and implications for the maritime industry. Journal of Maritime Technology, 35(4), 423-439.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Giddens, A. (2009). Sociology (6th ed.). Polity Press.
Hawkins, J., Murphy, R., & Taylor, M. (2021). The future of maritime transport: A review of autonomous shipping systems. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 23(3), 207-225.
Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (2020). The social construction of technology: A review of the literature. Cambridge University Press.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Practical research: Planning and design (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Smith, P., & Clarke, D. (2019). The regulatory challenges of autonomous ships: A global perspective. International Journal of Shipping Law, 18(2), 108-122.
Van der Waal, K., Janssen, M., & Verheul, M. (2022). Automation and labor in the maritime sector: A critical review. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(5), 693-710.
Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., & Liu, S. (2022). The impact of automation on labor displacement in the maritime industry. Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 58(2), 212-230.
